The conditioning angle of Brave New World is genuinely unsettling, and cranking the Ford mythology into a full-blown religion is a bold move that pays off. Great dystopian setup. Strong foundation.
I read the abridged version in high school, so my memory of the book was pretty vague. Still, having loved it, I came in with high expectations.
Turns out memory and reality don't always match.
First surprise: they get to the Savage Reserve fast. In my head, that was a second-half reveal. Nope. It threw me off the pacing early on, and I spent a good chunk of the book waiting for a gear shift that never quite came.
I also remembered Lenina as almost a co-lead, her story arc feeling as central as Bernard Marx's. Reading it now, that's not really the case. Maybe the abridged version gave her more space. Maybe I just projected. Either way, it felt odd.
And the world itself, man, I wanted more of it. Compared to 1984, which practically drowns you in its nightmare, Huxley's society feels a little underexposed. You get the ideas, but not always the weight of them.
Here's the thing though: Brave New World is an excellent book. I'm just pretty sure I read it at the wrong time… right after finishing 1984. That's not a fair fight for anyone…
Does the sequencing of what you read affect how you land on a book? Curious if anyone else has read these two back to back.
May 13, 2026
Brave New World
Categories:
Books
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment